<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/">
  <title>TreeGarden - Commentaires</title>
  <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
  <link>http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/</link>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:creator></dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2004-08-23T14:55:10+00:00</dc:date>
  <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.dotclear.net/" />
  
  <sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
  <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
  <sy:updateBase>2004-08-23T14:55:10+00:00</sy:updateBase>
  
  <items>
  <rdf:Seq>
    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c67" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c66" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c64" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c63" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c62" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c61" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c59" />
  </rdf:Seq>
  </items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c67">
  <title>Back in town ! - obi</title>
  <link>http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c67</link>
  <dc:date>2004-08-23T14:55:10+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:creator>obi</dc:creator>
  <description>Yes, the main difference is that this one actually works ;o)
I'd like to talk to Demartini one of these days, just to hear what is has to say.

Sinon, ces concours, ca a donne quoi ?...</description>
  <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the main difference is that this one actually works ;o)<br />
I'd like to talk to Demartini one of these days, just to hear what is has to say.<br />
<br />
Sinon, ces concours, ca a donne quoi ?<br />
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c66">
  <title>Back in town ! - GessIt !</title>
  <link>http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c66</link>
  <dc:date>2004-08-23T14:38:54+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:creator>GessIt !</dc:creator>
  <description>"The aim of this circuit is to be a test exercice"

Obi, do you remember the day when I had the best mark with this answer ?...</description>
  <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The aim of this circuit is to be a test exercice&quot;<br />
<br />
Obi, do you remember the day when I had the best mark with this answer ?</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c64">
  <title>Back in town ! - obi</title>
  <link>http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c64</link>
  <dc:date>2004-08-20T10:01:05+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:creator>obi</dc:creator>
  <description>Comm'on, you aren't blind !
OK, this is a fixed point round ( int16, LSB 2^-9), and if someone knows a better algorithm, I'd be glad to hear about it......</description>
  <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comm'on, you aren't blind !<br />
OK, this is a fixed point round ( int16, LSB 2^-9), and if someone knows a better algorithm, I'd be glad to hear about it...</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c63">
  <title>Back in town ! - leshauss</title>
  <link>http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c63</link>
  <dc:date>2004-08-19T22:58:20+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:creator>leshauss</dc:creator>
  <description>you png is too blurred for me to read :)...</description>
  <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you png is too blurred for me to read :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c62">
  <title>Back in town ! - obi</title>
  <link>http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c62</link>
  <dc:date>2004-08-19T15:13:52+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:creator>obi</dc:creator>
  <description>Nope, this is pure software.
Clue : the AND block is not an AND gate but a bitmask ... But you could have guessed that looking at the value of its inputs/outputs ......</description>
  <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, this is pure software.<br />
Clue : the AND block is not an AND gate but a bitmask ... But you could have guessed that looking at the value of its inputs/outputs ...</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c61">
  <title>Back in town ! - leshaussebons</title>
  <link>http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c61</link>
  <dc:date>2004-08-19T14:40:06+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:creator>leshaussebons</dc:creator>
  <description>It reminds me the class of automatics, therefore, I never used the same standard for the logical doors, but I bet that thoses doors are more "electronical" =)...</description>
  <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It reminds me the class of automatics, therefore, I never used the same standard for the logical doors, but I bet that thoses doors are more &quot;electronical&quot; =)</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c59">
  <title>Back in town ! - obi</title>
  <link>http://un.regne.net/dotclear/index.php/2004/08/19/34-back-in-town#c59</link>
  <dc:date>2004-08-19T10:10:21+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:creator>obi</dc:creator>
  <description>If someone finds a better way to provide the same functionality, I'd be glad to listen to it !...</description>
  <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone finds a better way to provide the same functionality, I'd be glad to listen to it !</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>
